Authority & status
Who attended, who instructed them, the authorised HCEO where relevant, and the legal basis relied upon.
Enforcement investigations
We reconstruct the enforcement from the documents and evidence: who had authority, what instrument was being enforced, what property was taken, who owned it, what procedure followed and what loss actually resulted.
Strong enforcement disputes turn on evidence. We build a structured file capable of being reviewed by the client, a solicitor or counsel: chronology, authority, ownership, fees, procedural compliance, evidence gaps and loss.
Who attended, who instructed them, the authorised HCEO where relevant, and the legal basis relied upon.
The underlying enforcement instrument, Notice of Enforcement, dates, debtor identity and amount claimed.
Vehicles, machinery, stock and other goods said to belong to somebody other than the judgment debtor.
How entry occurred, what was said, what was clamped or removed, and the paperwork produced.
Enforcement-stage fees, sale or disposal charges, disbursements and whether the relevant stage was actually reached.
Asset value, loss of use, hire costs, business interruption and the evidence needed to prove causation and quantum.
Third-party cars, vans, machinery, stock or equipment where ownership can be evidenced and the enforcement process needs to be tested.
Business vehicles, machinery or equipment where removal may have caused measurable loss of use, hire costs or interruption.
Where the identity, certification, employer, authorised HCEO or chain of instruction needs to be established as at the enforcement date.
Where charges, notices, entry, taking control, removal, sale or handling of a third-party claim require a line-by-line audit.
If goods are currently detained or a sale is imminent, say this clearly in the intake and provide every known deadline. Submitting an enquiry does not itself stop enforcement or a sale.
Upload the Notice of Enforcement, writ or warrant if available, inventory or controlled-goods paperwork, fee statements, correspondence, photographs, CCTV or body-worn-video references, ownership evidence, finance or lease documents, bank proof of purchase and evidence of financial loss.
The review can include an enforcement chronology, agent/HCEO status check, authority and instrument audit, ownership analysis, CPR 85 issue map where relevant, fee reconstruction, Schedule 12 compliance matrix, evidence-gap schedule and quantified loss summary.
Wolfe & Black is not a firm of solicitors and does not conduct reserved legal activities. We provide evidence analysis, case preparation and permitted support. Where proceedings, advocacy or another reserved activity requires an authorised lawyer, we will identify that at the review stage.