WOLFE&BLACK

Directors & insolvency · High Court insolvency judgment

High Court distinguishes DLA debt from misfeasance claim

Hinton v Stobinski [2026] EWHC 2386 (Ch) ·

← All findings

What was published

The High Court considered a liquidator claim including an alleged £112,506 overdrawn director’s loan account and other disputed payments. The judgment distinguishes an ordinary repayment debt under a director’s loan from claims based on misfeasance or breach of duty, while also examining the underlying evidence, company records and director conduct.

Why it matters

A liquidator’s DLA figure should be tested against the underlying ledger, bank transactions, accounting journals, dividends, remuneration, expenses and contemporaneous records. The legal basis of the claim also matters: a repayment debt and a misfeasance claim are not automatically the same thing.

Read the original

BAILII · Hinton v Stobinski [2026] EWHC 2386 (Ch) · 22 September 2026

Open official publication ↗

Wolfe & Black was not involved in this matter. This summary is general information about a published source, not an assessment of your case. We are not a firm of solicitors.