WOLFE&BLACK
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE · LICENSING · CASE PREPARATIONTELL US WHAT'S HAPPENED

SEND & education · Upper Tribunal judgment

AM and SP v Wokingham: EHCP provision and placement reasoning

[2026] UKUT 327 (AAC) ·

← All findings

What was published

The Upper Tribunal found errors in the First-tier Tribunal’s approach to education otherwise than at school, the circumstances in which a location may appear in Section F, and the identification of a special school in Section I. The decision was set aside and remitted.

What this means for other cases

Section F provision and Section I placement require distinct, evidence-led reasoning. A location should only be specified as part of Section F where it is inherent or integral to the educational quality of the provision.

What to preserve if you face a similar issue

Keep the original notice or decision, proof of receipt, current deadlines, relevant licences, correspondence and contemporaneous source records. The exact evidence needed depends on the allegation and regulatory procedure. Do not assume another case has the same facts or outcome.

Read the original

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber · [2026] UKUT 327 (AAC) · 11 September 2026

Open official publication ↗

Wolfe & Black was not involved in this matter. This summary is general information about a published source, not an assessment of your case. We are not a firm of solicitors.

SUBMIT YOUR MATTER