Current EHCP or decision
The current plan, refusal letter, annual review outcome or amendment notice.
Wolfe & Black case preparation
Evidence-led preparation for EHCP appeals, SEND disputes, annual reviews, provision failures, placements and education decision challenges.
Where an EHC needs assessment leads to a plan, the statutory process is generally expected to conclude within 20 weeks, subject to specified exceptions. Parents and young people can also challenge certain local-authority decisions, including refusal to assess, refusal to issue a plan, disputed provision and the named placement.
We separate identified needs from the provision specified to meet them, compare professional recommendations with the wording of the plan, and organise the evidence around the sections or decisions actually in dispute.
The current plan, refusal letter, annual review outcome or amendment notice.
Educational psychology, speech and language, occupational therapy, medical and school reports.
Records showing what support was specified, what was actually delivered and any gaps or changes.
Requests, responses, review papers, mediation information and any Tribunal documents.
Send the decision, current EHCP and strongest professional reports. We identify the disputed issues and scope the evidence work required.
Defined scope
Focused review of the authority decision, plan sections in dispute, deadlines and the evidence already available.
Defined scope
Professional recommendations mapped against Sections B and F, with omissions, vague provision and evidential gaps identified.
Defined scope
Issue schedule, chronology, evidence structure and requested amendments prepared for the next stage, within our permitted scope.
Free initial assessment and highly competitive fees. Your initial enquiry assessment does not include a detailed document review or substantive casework. We provide a clear, tailored quotation before paid work begins, with fixed-fee arrangements where appropriate. Any disbursements are explained separately and require your approval in advance.
We identify the decision, issues, evidence, chronology and next practical step. Our work is tailored to the facts and stage of the matter, with the regulatory boundary identified before work is accepted.
Focused, evidence-led preparation built around the material that matters.
Focused, evidence-led preparation built around the material that matters.
Focused, evidence-led preparation built around the material that matters.
Focused, evidence-led preparation built around the material that matters.
Focused, evidence-led preparation built around the material that matters.
Focused, evidence-led preparation built around the material that matters.
Guide
How to organise the decision, disputed EHCP sections, professional evidence and requested changes before a SEND Tribunal appeal.
Read guide →Guide
How to prepare evidence after a local authority refuses to carry out an EHC needs assessment, including the decision, existing support and evidence of possible special educational needs.
Read guide →Guide
How to organise assessment material and professional evidence after a local authority assesses but refuses to issue an EHC plan.
Read guide →Guide
A practical evidence-led approach to disputed needs, special educational provision and placement wording in an EHC plan.
Read guide →Guide
How to compare Section F with professional recommendations and organise evidence where special educational provision is vague, omitted or not being delivered.
Read guide →Guide
How to build a record of the annual review, recommendations, requested amendments, local-authority decisions and disputed provision or placement.
Read guide →Wolfe & Black is not a firm of solicitors. We provide non-reserved case preparation and permitted support. Reserved or separately regulated work is not undertaken unless a lawful basis exists; where it is required, we identify the need for an appropriately authorised professional.
Tell us what happened, what decision or proceedings you face and the deadline. We will identify whether Wolfe & Black can support the matter directly, whether an authorised professional is needed for a particular step, or whether the matter should be referred elsewhere.